I had a housemate mid-90's who started the human Jen-ome project.
If you were named Jen, and entered the house, you had to sign in. We had over 100 signatories, proving that Jen is -way- too common a name if you were born between '68 and '78.
It had to be a different Jennifer. That filthbot protocol was clearly RFC675/FB whereas the Jennifer we all know and love works at the much higher IPv6/FB filthbot protocol.
12 comments:
You scared me. I thought I was sleep-commenting or something.
was that you getting your freak on then?
Dear Lord... the title of your post just hit me. Let me clarify what I said earlier.
THAT WAS NOT ME!
There is an imposter Jennifer who does not Say Yes on Sadly, No! I've known this for a while.
Isn't she the same one that visits RoD?
Another good reason to choose a user name/screen name.
I had a housemate mid-90's who started the human Jen-ome project.
If you were named Jen, and entered the house, you had to sign in. We had over 100 signatories, proving that Jen is -way- too common a name if you were born between '68 and '78.
Sarah, Sara and Sera also ought to be retired, mdhatter.
As for the Jennifer at hand...hee hee.
I think the multiple personalities suite her/them.
It had to be a different Jennifer. That filthbot protocol was clearly RFC675/FB whereas the Jennifer we all know and love works at the much higher IPv6/FB filthbot protocol.
Thank you for understanding the nuance and caliber of the filthbot.
I thought she was "IPv6"/GarbageCan
Ok, any "can" joke that I come up with just sounds lame.
Post a Comment